|Lorenzo Romano Amedeo Carlo Avogadro, conte di Quaregna
e di Cerreto, was born in Turin, Italy. He was the son of Count Filippo
Avogadro and Anna Maria Vercellone.
Amedeo Avogadro went to school in Turin. Coming from a family of well established ecclesiastical lawyers, Avogadro was guided toward a legal career, and became a bachelor of jurisprudence in 1792, at the ripe old age of just 16 years. Four years later he gained his doctorate in ecclesiastical law and began to practice. In 1801 he was appointed secretary to the prefecture of the department of Eridano.
In spite of his successful legal career, Avogadro also showed an interest in natural philosophy, and in 1800 he began private studies of mathematics and physics. His first scientific research in 1803, undertaken jointly with his brother Felice, was on electricity.
|Avogadro led an industrious life, and was a modest man, working in
isolation. This probably contributed to his relative obscurity, particularly
In order to understand the contribution that Avogadro made, we
must consider some of the ideas being developed at this time. Chemistry was
just beginning to become an exact science. The Law of Definite Proportions
and the Law of Multiple Proportions were well accepted by 1808, at which
time John Dalton published his New System of Chemical Philosophy.
|Dalton proposed that the atoms of each element had a characteristic
atomic weight, and that it was atoms that were the combining units in chemical
reactions. Dalton had no method of measuring atomic weights unambiguously,
so made the incorrect assumption that in the most common compound between
two elements, there was one atom of each.
At around this time, Gay-Lussac was studying the chemical reactions
of gases, and found that the ratios of volumes of the reacting gases were
small integer numbers. This provided a more logical method of assigning atomic
weights. Gay-Lussac did not carry through the full implications of his work.
However, Dalton realised that a simple integral relation between volumes
of reacting gases implied an equally simple relation between reacting particles.
Dalton still equated particles with atoms, and could not accept how one particle
of oxygen could yield two particles of water. This was a direct threat to
the relatively new atomic theory, and therefore Dalton tried to discredit
the work of Gay-Lussac.
|In 1811, Avogadro published an article in Journal de Physique that clearly drew the distinction between the molecule and the atom. He pointed out that Dalton had confused the concepts of atoms and molecules. The "atoms" of nitrogen and oxygen are in reality "molecules" containing two atoms each. Thus two molecules of hydrogen can combine with one molecule of oxygen to produce two molecules of water.|
|Avogadro suggested that equal volumes of all gases at the same temperature
and pressure contain the same number of molecules which is now known as Avogadro's
The work of Avogadro was almost completely neglected until it was forcefully presented by Stanislao Cannizarro at the Karlsruhe Conference in 1860. He showed that Avogadro's Principle could be used to determine not only molar masses, but also, indirectly, atomic masses. The reason for the earlier neglect of Avogadro's work was probably the deeply rooted conviction that chemical combination occurred by virtue of an affinity between unlike elements. After the electrical discoveries of Galvani and Volta, this affinity was generally ascribed to the attraction between unlike charges. The idea that two identical atoms of hydrogen might combine into the compound molecular hydrogen was abhorrent to the chemical philosophy of the early nineteenth century.
It was long after Avogadro was dead that the idea of a mole was introduced. Since a molecular weight in grams (mole) of any substance contains the same number of molecules, then according to Avogadro's Principle, the molar volumes of all gases should be the same. The number of molecules in one mole is now called Avogadro's number. It must be emphasised that Avogadro, of course, had no knowledge of moles, or of the number that was to bear his name. Thus the number was never actually determined by Avogadro himself.
As we all know today, Avogadro's number is very large, the presently accepted value being 6.0221367 x 1023. The size of such a number is extremely difficult to comprehend. There are many awe-inspiring illustrations to help visualize the enormous size of this number. For example:
An Avogadro's number of standard soft drink cans would cover
the surface of the earth to a depth of over 200 miles. If you had
Avogadro's number of unpopped popcorn kernels, and spread them across the
United States of America, the country would be covered in popcorn to a depth
of over 9 miles.
Cannizarro, around 1860, used Avogadro's ideas to obtain a set of atomic weights, based upon oxygen having an atomic weight of 16. In 1865, Loschmidt used a combination of liquid density, gaseous viscosity, and the kinetic theory of gases, to establish roughly the size of molecules, and hence the number of molecules in 1 cm3 of gas.
During the latter part of the nineteenth century, it was possible to obtain reasonable estimates for Avogadro's number from sedimentation measurements of colloidal particles. Into the twentieth century, then Mullikens oil drop experiment gave much better values, and was used for many years.A more modern method is to calculate the Avogadro number from the density of a crystal, the relative atomic mass, and the unit cell length, determined from x-ray methods. To be useful for this purpose, the crystal must be free of defects. Very accurate values of these quantities for silicon have been measured at the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST).